A new article in the Journal of the History of Biology:
Kuang-chi Hung
Abstract In 1859, Harvard botanist Asa Gray (1810–1888) published an essay of what he called “the abstract of Japan botany.” In it, he applied Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory to explain why strong similarities could be found between the flora of Japan and that of eastern North America, which provoked his famous debate with Louis Agassiz (1807–1873) and initiated Gray’s efforts to secure a place for Darwinian biology in the American sciences. Notably, although the Gray–Agassiz debate has become one of the most thoroughly studied scientific debates, historians of science remain unable to answer one critical question: How was Gray able to acquire specimens from Japan? Making use of previously unknown archival materials, this article scrutinizes the institutional, instrumental, financial, and military settings that enabled Gray’s collector, Charles Wright (1811–1885), to travel to Japan, as well as examine Wright’s collecting practices in Japan. I argue that it is necessary to examine Gray’s diagnosis of Japan’s flora and the subsequent debate about it from the viewpoint of field sciences. The field-centered approach not only unveils an array of historical significances that have been overshadowed by the analytical framework of the Darwinian revolution and the reception of Darwinism, but also places a seemingly domestic incident in a transnational context.
Full reference? I’d like to know more about the Gray-Agassiz debate, and also how Gray managed to be so fast off the mark after Japan was opened out to Western contact in 1854. Gray of course was seminal in the development of Christian accommodationism towards evolution, while Agassiz was perhaps Darwin’s most formidable intellectual opponent
Sorry, the article title is a link to the article page online: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10739-015-9431-6
thanks 🙂
Hello
Thought you might enjoy my latest post on CD.
All best
Empireposts
Thanks!