I read several articles from David Livingstone on the topic of this new book while in graduate school. Nice to see he’s put out a book collecting all this historical research into one place:
David N. Livingstone, Dealing with Darwin: Place, Politics, and Rhetoric in Religious Engagements with Evolution (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014), 280 pp.
Using place, politics, and rhetoric as analytical tools, historical geographer David N. Livingstone investigates how religious communities sharing a Scots Presbyterian heritage engaged with Darwin and Darwinism at the turn of the twentieth century. His findings, presented as the prestigious Gifford Lectures, transform our understandings of the relationship between science and religion. The particulars of place—whether in Edinburgh, Belfast, Toronto, Princeton, or Columbia, South Carolina—shaped the response to Darwin’s theories. Were they tolerated, repudiated, or welcomed? Livingstone shows how Darwin was read in different ways, with meaning distilled from Darwin’s texts depending on readers’ own histories—their literary genealogies and cultural preoccupations. That the theory of evolution fared differently in different places, Livingstone writes, is “exactly what Darwin might have predicted. As the theory diffused, it diverged.” Dealing with Darwin shows the profound extent to which theological debates about evolution were rooted in such matters as anxieties over control of education, the politics of race relations, the nature of local scientific traditions, and challenges to traditional cultural identity. In some settings, conciliation with the new theory, even endorsement, was possible—demonstrating that attending to the specific nature of individual communities subverts an inclination to assume a single relationship between science and religion in general, evolution and Christianity in particular. Livingstone concludes with contemporary examples to remind us that what scientists can say and what others can hear in different venues differ today just as much as they did in the past.
Historian of science Carla Nappi interviewed Livingstone about Dealing with Darwin for New Books in Science, Technology, and Society, saying that “with its vibrant language, careful research, and compelling argument, Dealing with Darwin will be a must-read for historians of science, especially those interested in evolution, religion, Darwin, and/or locality.”
Evolution is the Devil’s favorite fairy tale! http://creationsciencestudy.wordpress.com/2014/05/20/evolution-is-the-devils-favorite-myth/
Repent or burn in Hell!
Yours in Christ,
I would remind people like Jim Solouki, who think it’s clever to mock our opponents, that there’s a war on, and that you don’t persuade your opponents’ ground troops to change sides by sneering at them.
You need to know what drives them and it’s not stupidity. I will be reading this book to help me find out.
I seriously wonder if this Jim Solouki, who has posted several times on my blog now, is putting all this on as a joke. I mean, seriously, look at his website – it must be humor! If not, so sad. So very sad.
this is not a joke. My blog is as legitimate as Jesus. I am trying to save the unsaved sinners like you, because the Holy Spirit tells me to. I am doing the Lord’s work, and you should repent.
I’m trying to save you. Wouldn’t it be sad if after we die, I get into heaven while you’re cast into Hell? You seem like a nice man, and I don’t want you to burn in hell! I want you to go to heaven!
I think your time would be better spent elsewhere, Jim. I base my life on the real world, not some made up fantasy. Like I stated in an email to you, you must live a sad, pathetic, and lonely life.